The effect of adjustment period on maximum acceptable frequency for a roofing task [An article from: International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics]

This digital document is a journal article from International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, published by Elsevier in 2007. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Media Library immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

Description:
An experimental study was conducted to determine an appropriate adjustment period using the psychophysical approach for evaluating acceptable work limits for a task involving sloped walking/working surface. A workstation was designed and constructed to simulate a sloped residential roof. Twelve healthy males from a university population served as subjects. The subjects were provided training until the experimenter was confident in their ability to perform the simulated roof-shingling task, while comparing to the experienced roofers' performance. Results indicated that 198 shingles/h is an acceptable roof shingling frequency for a workday. Time period had significant effect on psychophysical, postural sway, and selected physiological responses. Appropriate adjustment period using the psychophysical approach for evaluating acceptable work limits for tasks involving sloped surface was determined to be 2h. Postural sway and physiological variables support these findings. The results from this study could aid in setting safe work limits in roofing construction for males. This study may prove to be useful for practical applications for the reduction of the risk of occupational injuries and fatalities, while improving productivity and safety in the roofing industry. Relevance to industry: Results from this study could aid in setting acceptable work limits for roof shingling operations. Ergonomic intervention may decrease the risks of falls from roof thus reducing workers compensation costs and lost productivity of the worker.