No direction home? Wittgensteinian therapy and the private language arguments [An article from: Language and Communication]
Book Details
Author(s)M. de Gaynesford
PublisherElsevier
ISBN / ASINB000PDYIQO
ISBN-13978B000PDYIQ2
AvailabilityAvailable for download now
Sales Rank11,711,873
MarketplaceUnited States 🇺🇸
Description
This digital document is a journal article from Language and Communication, published by Elsevier in 2007. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Media Library immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
Description:
Coming to a correct interpretation of the private language arguments depends largely on settling what they aim to achieve. This paper counters the recent problematic tendency to radicalize the options: that Wittgenstein was either a dogmatist who sought conclusive answers to impersonal questions by presenting the associated grammar in surveyable form, or that he was a therapist who offered entirely flexible forms of treatment to subjects who could only hope to obtain temporary remission from personal anxieties. Gordon Baker's later work tended strongly to the latter view, but his own approach administers the appropriate corrective. If our interpretation is suitably constrained by Wittgenstein's own strictures on method and procedure, and particularly his insights into 'giving philosophy peace', we will appreciate that both tendencies need to make considerable concessive moves.
Description:
Coming to a correct interpretation of the private language arguments depends largely on settling what they aim to achieve. This paper counters the recent problematic tendency to radicalize the options: that Wittgenstein was either a dogmatist who sought conclusive answers to impersonal questions by presenting the associated grammar in surveyable form, or that he was a therapist who offered entirely flexible forms of treatment to subjects who could only hope to obtain temporary remission from personal anxieties. Gordon Baker's later work tended strongly to the latter view, but his own approach administers the appropriate corrective. If our interpretation is suitably constrained by Wittgenstein's own strictures on method and procedure, and particularly his insights into 'giving philosophy peace', we will appreciate that both tendencies need to make considerable concessive moves.
