Ethanol recovery from corn fiber hydrolysate fermentations by pervaporation [An article from: Bioresource Technology]
Book Details
PublisherElsevier
ISBN / ASINB000RQZSPE
ISBN-13978B000RQZSP2
AvailabilityAvailable for download now
MarketplaceUnited States 🇺🇸
Description
This digital document is a journal article from Bioresource Technology, published by Elsevier in 2004. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Media Library immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
Description:
Corn fiber, a byproduct of corn wet milling, is an attractive feedstock for biomass ethanol production. Corn fiber was hydrolyzed by dilute sulfuric acid and neutralized by one of two methods: conventional lime treatment or neutralization by strongly basic anion exchange. The anion exchange neutralized (AEN) hydrolysate contained substantially lower levels of the inhibiting compounds furfural, 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, and acetic acid compared to the lime neutralized hydrolysate. In batch fermentations the ethanol yields and final ethanol concentration of the two hydrolysates were similar at 0.32-0.43 g/g and 29-44 g/l, respectively. Sugar consumption in the AEN fermentations was superior. Coupling of a membrane pervaporation unit to a fed-batch fermentation of AEN hydrolysate maintained the ethanol concentration below 25 g/l with complete sugar utilization for approximately 5 days. A concentrated ethanol stream of 17 wt.% ethanol was produced by the pervaporation unit.
Description:
Corn fiber, a byproduct of corn wet milling, is an attractive feedstock for biomass ethanol production. Corn fiber was hydrolyzed by dilute sulfuric acid and neutralized by one of two methods: conventional lime treatment or neutralization by strongly basic anion exchange. The anion exchange neutralized (AEN) hydrolysate contained substantially lower levels of the inhibiting compounds furfural, 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, and acetic acid compared to the lime neutralized hydrolysate. In batch fermentations the ethanol yields and final ethanol concentration of the two hydrolysates were similar at 0.32-0.43 g/g and 29-44 g/l, respectively. Sugar consumption in the AEN fermentations was superior. Coupling of a membrane pervaporation unit to a fed-batch fermentation of AEN hydrolysate maintained the ethanol concentration below 25 g/l with complete sugar utilization for approximately 5 days. A concentrated ethanol stream of 17 wt.% ethanol was produced by the pervaporation unit.
