Suitability and redundancy of non-homogeneous weight restrictions for measuring the relative efficiency in DEA [An article from: European Journal of Operational Research]
Book Details
Author(s)V.V. Podinovski
PublisherElsevier
ISBN / ASINB000RR0VXC
ISBN-13978B000RR0VX2
AvailabilityAvailable for download now
Sales Rank99,999,999
MarketplaceUnited States 🇺🇸
Description
This digital document is a journal article from European Journal of Operational Research, published by Elsevier in 2004. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Media Library immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
Description:
Weight restrictions are non-homogeneous if they are formulated as linear 'less than or equal to' inequalities with a non-zero constant on the right-hand side. Absolute weight bounds are typical examples. It has recently been shown that, in the presence of such restrictions, the fractional linear data envelopment analysis (DEA) model and its linear forms may incorrectly evaluate the maximum relative efficiency of the assessed unit. This paper investigates the problem further, and identifies certain types of non-homogeneous restrictions that do not cause the observed error. Thus the relative efficiency is always assessed correctly if, in the same CCR model, no positive lower bounds are imposed on any of the input weights and no upper bounds are imposed on any of the output weights. The redundancy of certain types of weight restrictions in DEA models is also considered. Based on this, the traditional use of small positive constants to separate weights from zero in DEA models is questioned.
Description:
Weight restrictions are non-homogeneous if they are formulated as linear 'less than or equal to' inequalities with a non-zero constant on the right-hand side. Absolute weight bounds are typical examples. It has recently been shown that, in the presence of such restrictions, the fractional linear data envelopment analysis (DEA) model and its linear forms may incorrectly evaluate the maximum relative efficiency of the assessed unit. This paper investigates the problem further, and identifies certain types of non-homogeneous restrictions that do not cause the observed error. Thus the relative efficiency is always assessed correctly if, in the same CCR model, no positive lower bounds are imposed on any of the input weights and no upper bounds are imposed on any of the output weights. The redundancy of certain types of weight restrictions in DEA models is also considered. Based on this, the traditional use of small positive constants to separate weights from zero in DEA models is questioned.
![Interval articulation of superiority and precise elicitation of priorities [An article from: European Journal of Operational Research]](https://www.ebooknetworking.net/books/B00/0PD/medB000PDSPRM.jpg)
![On the linearisation of reference technologies for testing returns to scale in FDH models [An article from: European Journal of Operational Research]](https://www.ebooknetworking.net/books/B00/0RR/medB000RR0WEU.jpg)
![Selective convexity in DEA models [An article from: European Journal of Operational Research]](https://www.ebooknetworking.net/books/B00/0RR/medB000RR2PY0.jpg)
