Using scantron versus an audience response system for survey research: Does methodology matter when measuring computer-mediated communication competence? [An article from: Computers in Human Behavior]
Book Details
Author(s)U. Bunz
PublisherElsevier
ISBN / ASINB000RR2NCE
ISBN-13978B000RR2NC6
AvailabilityAvailable for download now
Sales Rank12,126,774
MarketplaceUnited States 🇺🇸
Description
This digital document is a journal article from Computers in Human Behavior, published by Elsevier in 2005. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Media Library immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
Description:
The purpose of this study was to investigate whether results of the computer-mediated communication (CMC) competency scale differ depending on the survey instrument used. Data were collected from 173 undergraduate students (53% female; average age 20). Of these, 96 subjects completed the questionnaire using scantron sheets, while 77 subjects used an audience response system called Classroom Performance System (CPS). All subjects completed a second questionnaire using paper-and-pencil to evaluate their experience with either the scantron sheets or the CPS. t-Test results show that using the CPS is more fun for participants (p
Description:
The purpose of this study was to investigate whether results of the computer-mediated communication (CMC) competency scale differ depending on the survey instrument used. Data were collected from 173 undergraduate students (53% female; average age 20). Of these, 96 subjects completed the questionnaire using scantron sheets, while 77 subjects used an audience response system called Classroom Performance System (CPS). All subjects completed a second questionnaire using paper-and-pencil to evaluate their experience with either the scantron sheets or the CPS. t-Test results show that using the CPS is more fun for participants (p
