Surrogate in-vehicle information systems and driver behaviour in an urban environment: A field study on the effects of visual and cognitive load [An ... Research Part F: Psychology and Behaviour] Buy on Amazon

https://www.ebooknetworking.net/books_detail-B000RR4LDS.html

Surrogate in-vehicle information systems and driver behaviour in an urban environment: A field study on the effects of visual and cognitive load [An ... Research Part F: Psychology and Behaviour]

7.95 USD
Buy New on Amazon 🇺🇸

Available for download now

Book Details

PublisherElsevier
ISBN / ASINB000RR4LDS
ISBN-13978B000RR4LD0
AvailabilityAvailable for download now
Sales Rank99,999,999
MarketplaceUnited States  🇺🇸

Description

This digital document is a journal article from Transportation Research Part F: Psychology and Behaviour, published by Elsevier in 2005. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Media Library immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

Description:
This field study was designed to investigate and compare the potential or sensitivity of the selected HASTE assessment methods to reflect the effects of different surrogate in-vehicle information systems (S-IVIS) on driver behaviour in an urban environment. Two types of S-IVIS were used, an auditory one representing cognitive tasks and a visual one. The interaction with other vehicles in yielding situations changed somewhat when conducting the secondary task compared to normal driving. Both S-IVIS tasks tended to decrease the proportion of proper yielding of the right-of-way to other vehicles at urban intersections. In addition, the interaction with vulnerable road users was affected by secondary task performance as well. The S-IVIS tasks tended to produce increases in speed before the intersection in cases when there were vulnerable road users present at the urban intersection compared to driving without the secondary task. However, the cognitive task seemed more frequently to cause observed inappropriate behaviour towards vulnerable road users at urban intersections than the visual task. For both S-IVIS tasks, the percentage of correct responses was highest for the static situation and lowest when conducted in urban environment and the percentage of correct responses decreased with increasing task difficulty. In general, the results suggest that driving with a secondary task in an urban environment caused some changes in driving behaviour. In particular, proper interaction with other road users suffered when the driver had a secondary task.
Donate to EbookNetworking
Prev
Next