![Squamate phylogeny, taxon sampling, and data congruence [An article from: Organisms Diversity & Evolution]](https://www.ebooknetworking.net/books/B00/0RR/bigB000RR4OUS.jpg)
Squamate phylogeny, taxon sampling, and data congruence [An article from: Organisms Diversity & Evolution]
Book Details
Author(s)M.S.Y. Lee
PublisherElsevier
ISBN / ASINB000RR4OUS
ISBN-13978B000RR4OU0
MarketplaceFrance 🇫🇷
Description
This digital document is a journal article from Organisms Diversity & Evolution, published by Elsevier in 2005. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Media Library immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
Description:
To investigate the affinities of snakes, amphisbaenians and dibamids, the phylogenetic relationships among the major lineages (families) of extinct and extant squamates are assessed through a combined analysis of 248 osteological, 133 soft anatomical, and 18 ecological traits. The osteological data set represents a revision of previous data, taking into account recent criticism; the ecological data set is new. In addition, potentially critical fossil taxa (polyglyphanodontids and macrocephalosaurs) are included for the first time. The osteological and soft anatomical data sets each place snakes within anguimorphs, with dibamids and amphisbaenians near gekkotans. The putative primitive fossil amphisbaenian Sineoamphisbaena groups with macrocephalosaurs and polyglyphanodontids, together the sister group to scleroglossans. All three data sets are congruent, and these results are reinforced by combined analyses. In these, as in the osteological analyses, snakes are nested within marine lizards. However, exclusion of fossil taxa from the osteological data set results in a 'limbless clade' consisting of snakes, amphisbaenians and dibamids, and introduces significant conflict between osteology and soft anatomy. Also, deletion tests and character weighting reveal that the signal in the reduced osteological data set is internally contradictory. These results increase confidence in the arrangement supported by the all-taxon osteological, the soft anatomical, and the combined data, and suggest that exclusion of fossils confounds the signal in the osteological data set. Finally, the morphological data support the nesting of snakes within marine lizards, and thus a marine origin of snakes. This result still holds when relationships between living forms are constrained to the topology suggested by molecular sequences: if marine lizards are allowed to 'float' within this molecular framework, they form the stem group to snakes, and do not group with varanids as previously suggested. See also Electronic Supplement at: http://www.senckenberg.de/odes/05-04.htm.
Description:
To investigate the affinities of snakes, amphisbaenians and dibamids, the phylogenetic relationships among the major lineages (families) of extinct and extant squamates are assessed through a combined analysis of 248 osteological, 133 soft anatomical, and 18 ecological traits. The osteological data set represents a revision of previous data, taking into account recent criticism; the ecological data set is new. In addition, potentially critical fossil taxa (polyglyphanodontids and macrocephalosaurs) are included for the first time. The osteological and soft anatomical data sets each place snakes within anguimorphs, with dibamids and amphisbaenians near gekkotans. The putative primitive fossil amphisbaenian Sineoamphisbaena groups with macrocephalosaurs and polyglyphanodontids, together the sister group to scleroglossans. All three data sets are congruent, and these results are reinforced by combined analyses. In these, as in the osteological analyses, snakes are nested within marine lizards. However, exclusion of fossil taxa from the osteological data set results in a 'limbless clade' consisting of snakes, amphisbaenians and dibamids, and introduces significant conflict between osteology and soft anatomy. Also, deletion tests and character weighting reveal that the signal in the reduced osteological data set is internally contradictory. These results increase confidence in the arrangement supported by the all-taxon osteological, the soft anatomical, and the combined data, and suggest that exclusion of fossils confounds the signal in the osteological data set. Finally, the morphological data support the nesting of snakes within marine lizards, and thus a marine origin of snakes. This result still holds when relationships between living forms are constrained to the topology suggested by molecular sequences: if marine lizards are allowed to 'float' within this molecular framework, they form the stem group to snakes, and do not group with varanids as previously suggested. See also Electronic Supplement at: http://www.senckenberg.de/odes/05-04.htm.
