In-process R&D: To capitalize or expense? [An article from: Journal of Engineering and Technology Management]
Book Details
Author(s)Z. Deng, B. Lev
PublisherElsevier
ISBN / ASINB000RR5Y3E
ISBN-13978B000RR5Y38
AvailabilityAvailable for download now
Sales Rank11,352,119
MarketplaceUnited States 🇺🇸
Description
This digital document is a journal article from Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, published by Elsevier in . The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Media Library immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
Description:
The FASB recently proposed the capitalization of acquired in-process R&D costs to replace the current practice of expensing this item. This proposal will likely be strongly opposed by corporate executives. We examine whether in-process R&D is an asset worthy of capitalization or an expense, and, if it is an asset, how reliable is its estimate. We find a significant association between the values of in-process R&D and acquiring firms' cash flows during the 3 years subsequent to acquisition, thereby supporting the FASB's proposal to recognize in-process R&D as an asset. Preliminary tests are positive for the reliability/objectivity of in-process R&D estimates.
Description:
The FASB recently proposed the capitalization of acquired in-process R&D costs to replace the current practice of expensing this item. This proposal will likely be strongly opposed by corporate executives. We examine whether in-process R&D is an asset worthy of capitalization or an expense, and, if it is an asset, how reliable is its estimate. We find a significant association between the values of in-process R&D and acquiring firms' cash flows during the 3 years subsequent to acquisition, thereby supporting the FASB's proposal to recognize in-process R&D as an asset. Preliminary tests are positive for the reliability/objectivity of in-process R&D estimates.
