A genetic algorithm for robotic assembly line balancing [An article from: European Journal of Operational Research] Buy on Amazon

https://www.ebooknetworking.net/books_detail-B000RR67MQ.html

A genetic algorithm for robotic assembly line balancing [An article from: European Journal of Operational Research]

5.95 USD
Buy New on Amazon 🇺🇸

Available for download now

Book Details

PublisherElsevier
ISBN / ASINB000RR67MQ
ISBN-13978B000RR67M7
AvailabilityAvailable for download now
Sales Rank99,999,999
MarketplaceUnited States  🇺🇸

Description

This digital document is a journal article from European Journal of Operational Research, published by Elsevier in . The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Media Library immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

Description:
Flexibility and automation in assembly lines can be achieved by the use of robots. The robotic assembly line balancing (RALB) problem is defined for robotic assembly line, where different robots may be assigned to the assembly tasks, and each robot needs different assembly times to perform a given task, because of its capabilities and specialization. The solution to the RALB problem includes an attempt for optimal assignment of robots to line stations and a balanced distribution of work between different stations. It aims at maximizing the production rate of the line. A genetic algorithm (GA) is used to find a solution to this problem. Two different procedures for adapting the GA to the RALB problem, by assigning robots with different capabilities to workstations are introduced: a recursive assignment procedure and a consecutive assignment procedure. The results of the GA are improved by a local optimization (hill climbing) work-piece exchange procedure. Tests conducted on a set of randomly generated problems, show that the Consecutive Assignment procedure achieves, in general, better solution quality (measured by average cycle time). Further tests are conducted to determine the best combination of parameters for the GA procedure. Comparison of the GA algorithm results with a truncated Branch and Bound algorithm for the RALB problem, demonstrates that the GA gives consistently better results.
Donate to EbookNetworking
Prev
Next