Simultaneous determination of five quinoxaline-1,4-dioxides in animal feeds using ultrasonic solvent extraction and high-performance liquid chromatography [An article from: Analytica Chimica Acta]
Book Details
PublisherElsevier
ISBN / ASINB000RR8KFS
ISBN-13978B000RR8KF8
AvailabilityAvailable for download now
Sales Rank99,999,999
MarketplaceUnited States 🇺🇸
Description
This digital document is a journal article from Analytica Chimica Acta, published by Elsevier in 2006. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Media Library immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
Description:
An HPLC method with UV detection has been established for the simultaneous quantitative determination of five quinoxaline-1,4-dioxides (carbadox, olaquindox, cyadox, mequindox, quinocetone) in porcine, chicken and fish feeds. Feed samples were extracted with methanol/acetonitrile/water (35:35:30, v/v/v) in an ultrasonic bath, and purified by solid phase extraction (SPE) on Alumina N cartridges. The samples were analyzed on an Eclipse XDB C"1"8 liquid chromatography column using a gradient program with methanol and water. Except for cyadox (>75%), recoveries of the drugs from feed samples spiked at 5, 50 and 200mgkg^-^1 ranged from 92 to 104%. Coefficients of variation were 2-13%. The decision limits (CC@a) for the five compounds were
Description:
An HPLC method with UV detection has been established for the simultaneous quantitative determination of five quinoxaline-1,4-dioxides (carbadox, olaquindox, cyadox, mequindox, quinocetone) in porcine, chicken and fish feeds. Feed samples were extracted with methanol/acetonitrile/water (35:35:30, v/v/v) in an ultrasonic bath, and purified by solid phase extraction (SPE) on Alumina N cartridges. The samples were analyzed on an Eclipse XDB C"1"8 liquid chromatography column using a gradient program with methanol and water. Except for cyadox (>75%), recoveries of the drugs from feed samples spiked at 5, 50 and 200mgkg^-^1 ranged from 92 to 104%. Coefficients of variation were 2-13%. The decision limits (CC@a) for the five compounds were
