We use cookies to run the site and, with your permission, to measure how it is used. You can accept all of them or deny the ones that are not needed. Read the cookie policy.
In case of parallel litigation where parties' contract contained clause designating Australian court as proper forum, Federal Court of Australia rules ... An article from: International Law Update
⭐ Ratings & Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first!
No reviews yet.
📖 Description
This digital document is an article from International Law Update, published by Transnational Law Associates on January 1, 2008. The length of the article is 554 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
Citation Details Title: In case of parallel litigation where parties' contract contained clause designating Australian court as proper forum, Federal Court of Australia rules that, where defending U.S. party's challenge to its jurisdiction is still pending, Australian party's request for notices for U.S. party to produce documents is premature. Author: Gale Reference Team Publication:International Law Update (Newsletter) Date: January 1, 2008 Publisher: Transnational Law Associates Volume: 14 Issue: 1 Page: ITEM08277004
