In case of parallel litigation where parties' contract contained clause designating Australian court as proper forum, Federal Court of Australia rules ... An article from: International Law Update

This digital document is an article from International Law Update, published by Transnational Law Associates on January 1, 2008. The length of the article is 554 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

Citation Details
Title: In case of parallel litigation where parties' contract contained clause designating Australian court as proper forum, Federal Court of Australia rules that, where defending U.S. party's challenge to its jurisdiction is still pending, Australian party's request for notices for U.S. party to produce documents is premature.
Author: Gale Reference Team
Publication:International Law Update (Newsletter)
Date: January 1, 2008
Publisher: Transnational Law Associates
Volume: 14 Issue: 1 Page: ITEM08277004

Distributed by Gale, a part of Cengage Learning