Sham peer review: perversions of a powerful process.(Peer Review): An article from: Physician Executive

This digital document is an article from Physician Executive, published by American College of Physician Executives on September 1, 2008. The length of the article is 3027 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

From the author: Sham peer review is a perversion of the process intended to protect patients and colleagues from ill, incompetent, unethical, dangerous, and unprofessional practitioners. Sham peer review is a virulent and highly charged issue.

Citation Details
Title: Sham peer review: perversions of a powerful process.(Peer Review)
Author: John-Henry Pfifferling
Publication:Physician Executive (Magazine/Journal)
Date: September 1, 2008
Publisher: American College of Physician Executives
Volume: 34 Issue: 5 Page: 24(6)

Distributed by Gale, a part of Cengage Learning