Deep secrecy.: An article from: Stanford Law Review
Book Details
Author(s)David E. Pozen
PublisherStanford Law School
ISBN / ASINB003A3HTJO
ISBN-13978B003A3HTJ6
MarketplaceCanada 🇨🇦
Description
This digital document is an article from Stanford Law Review, published by Stanford Law School on January 1, 2010. The length of the article is 44351 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
From the author: Attending to the depth of state secrets, the Article shows, can make a variety of conceptual and practical contributions to the debate on their usage. The deep/shallow distinction provides a vocabulary and an analytic framework with which to describe, assess, and compare secrets, without having to judge what they conceal It sheds light on how secrecy is employed and experienced, which types are likely to do the most damage, and where to focus reform efforts. And it gives more rigorous content to criticisms of Bush administration practices. Elaborating these claims, the Article also mines new constitutional territory--providing an original account of the role of state secrecy generally, as well as deep secrecy specifically, in our constitutional order.
Citation Details
Title: Deep secrecy.
Author: David E. Pozen
Publication:Stanford Law Review (Magazine/Journal)
Date: January 1, 2010
Publisher: Stanford Law School
Volume: 62 Issue: 2 Page: 257(83)
Distributed by Gale, a part of Cengage Learning
From the author: Attending to the depth of state secrets, the Article shows, can make a variety of conceptual and practical contributions to the debate on their usage. The deep/shallow distinction provides a vocabulary and an analytic framework with which to describe, assess, and compare secrets, without having to judge what they conceal It sheds light on how secrecy is employed and experienced, which types are likely to do the most damage, and where to focus reform efforts. And it gives more rigorous content to criticisms of Bush administration practices. Elaborating these claims, the Article also mines new constitutional territory--providing an original account of the role of state secrecy generally, as well as deep secrecy specifically, in our constitutional order.
Citation Details
Title: Deep secrecy.
Author: David E. Pozen
Publication:Stanford Law Review (Magazine/Journal)
Date: January 1, 2010
Publisher: Stanford Law School
Volume: 62 Issue: 2 Page: 257(83)
Distributed by Gale, a part of Cengage Learning
