Irrelevant confusion. (false advertising-like trademark claims): An article from: Stanford Law Review

This digital document is an article from Stanford Law Review, published by Stanford Law School on January 1, 2010. The length of the article is 23387 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

Citation Details
Title: Irrelevant confusion. (false advertising-like trademark claims)
Author: Mark A. Lemley
Publication:Stanford Law Review (Magazine/Journal)
Date: January 1, 2010
Publisher: Stanford Law School
Volume: 62 Issue: 2 Page: 413(42)

Distributed by Gale, a part of Cengage Learning