Welfare simplification: Thirty-two states' views on coordinating services for low-income families : fact sheet for Congressional requesters
Book Details
PublisherUniversity of Michigan Library
ISBN / ASINB003HIXSW4
ISBN-13978B003HIXSW9
MarketplaceCanada 🇨🇦
Description
Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO provided information on states' responses to selected questions on the unification of human services programs to: (1) allow access to and use of benefits by all clients; (2) improve effectiveness of service delivery; and (3) achieve efficient use of human services resources.
GAO found that, of the 32 states that responded to the questionnaire: (1) 31 would like to achieve more service integration; (2) 19 have started at least one service integration demonstration project since January 1, 1983; (3) 11 have considered legislation related to service integration since January 1, 1985; (4) most offer service integration for the Aid to Families with Dependent Children, Food Stamp, and Medicaid programs; (5) most indicated that certain desirable outcomes, such as increased client use of benefits and decreased federal and state administrative costs, could result from more service integration; (6) most indicated that the Departments of Agriculture and Health and Human Services have already encouraged or will encourage service integration to some extent; (7) only 1 stated that the Department of Housing and Urban Development has encouraged or will encourage integration beyond a moderate extent; and (8) 25 believe that eligible families may not be receiving benefits due to transportation difficulties, while 21 believe it is due to lack of local outreach services.
GAO found that, of the 32 states that responded to the questionnaire: (1) 31 would like to achieve more service integration; (2) 19 have started at least one service integration demonstration project since January 1, 1983; (3) 11 have considered legislation related to service integration since January 1, 1985; (4) most offer service integration for the Aid to Families with Dependent Children, Food Stamp, and Medicaid programs; (5) most indicated that certain desirable outcomes, such as increased client use of benefits and decreased federal and state administrative costs, could result from more service integration; (6) most indicated that the Departments of Agriculture and Health and Human Services have already encouraged or will encourage service integration to some extent; (7) only 1 stated that the Department of Housing and Urban Development has encouraged or will encourage integration beyond a moderate extent; and (8) 25 believe that eligible families may not be receiving benefits due to transportation difficulties, while 21 believe it is due to lack of local outreach services.










