The implied author, deficient narration, and nonfiction narrative: or, what's off-kilter in The Year of Magical Thinking and The Diving Bell and the Butterfly?(Essay): An article from: Style

This digital document is an article from Style, published by Northern Illinois University on March 22, 2011. The length of the article is 8409 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

From the author: Using the framework of a rhetorical theory of narrative, I advance two main arguments. (1) The concept of the implied author is as useful for the understanding of nonfictional narrative as it is for fictional narrative. In developing this case, I identify and counter the underlying reasons why the concept encounters resistance from many theorists (Occam's razor and the anti-intentionalist orthodoxy of contemporary theory). (2) The concept of the implied author and the distinction between fiction and nonfiction help capture the different rhetorical dynamics of unreliable and deficient narration. The first is intentionally off-kilter and the second is unintentionally so. I then explore the consequences of key passages of deficient narration in Didion's and Bauby's memoirs.

Citation Details
Title: The implied author, deficient narration, and nonfiction narrative: or, what's off-kilter in The Year of Magical Thinking and The Diving Bell and the Butterfly?(Essay)
Author: James Phelan
Publication:Style (Magazine/Journal)
Date: March 22, 2011
Publisher: Northern Illinois University
Volume: 45 Issue: 1 Page: 119(20)

Article Type: Essay

Distributed by Gale, a part of Cengage Learning