China's indigenous innovation policy in the context of its WTO obligations and commitments.: An article from: Georgetown Journal of International Law
Book Details
Author(s)Siyuan An, Brian Peck
PublisherGeorgetown University Law Center
ISBN / ASINB005DVDXWS
ISBN-13978B005DVDXW7
MarketplaceIndia 🇮🇳
Description
This digital document is an article from Georgetown Journal of International Law, published by Georgetown University Law Center on January 1, 2011. The length of the article is 29390 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
From the author: As discussed in this article, foreign industries and governments have raised some valid challenges to China's indigenous innovation measures as being inconsistent with WTO rules. This article examines the viability of those claims in the context of China's WTO obligations, such as the lack of transparency in China's publication of these measures, possible discriminatory treatment of foreign-held intellectual property rights, a non-violation claim under Article XXIII of the GATT, and other possible claims. Finally, based on conclusions drawn from this analysis, this article provides a possible option for moving forward in addressing the concerns of both foreign and Chinese interests.
Citation Details
Title: China's indigenous innovation policy in the context of its WTO obligations and commitments.
Author: Siyuan An
Publication:Georgetown Journal of International Law (Magazine/Journal)
Date: January 1, 2011
Publisher: Georgetown University Law Center
Volume: 42 Issue: 2 Page: 375(73)
Distributed by Gale, a part of Cengage Learning
From the author: As discussed in this article, foreign industries and governments have raised some valid challenges to China's indigenous innovation measures as being inconsistent with WTO rules. This article examines the viability of those claims in the context of China's WTO obligations, such as the lack of transparency in China's publication of these measures, possible discriminatory treatment of foreign-held intellectual property rights, a non-violation claim under Article XXIII of the GATT, and other possible claims. Finally, based on conclusions drawn from this analysis, this article provides a possible option for moving forward in addressing the concerns of both foreign and Chinese interests.
Citation Details
Title: China's indigenous innovation policy in the context of its WTO obligations and commitments.
Author: Siyuan An
Publication:Georgetown Journal of International Law (Magazine/Journal)
Date: January 1, 2011
Publisher: Georgetown University Law Center
Volume: 42 Issue: 2 Page: 375(73)
Distributed by Gale, a part of Cengage Learning
