The Testament of Peter the Great (History: Fiction or Science? Book 19)

US research of earth-moon mechanics lead by NASA astrophysist Robert Newton leads russian mathematicians of Moscow State University to a breakthrough in the chronology of civilization including Russia. Peter the Great has literally ruined Russia, lost at least a quarter of its population, tried to break into Europe, moved the capital of Russia from Moscow to St Peterbourg, made Russia to an awkward upstart and a laughing stock of Europe. After spending 3 years in Holland and Germany Peter I ordered the nobility to cut beards, smoke tobacco and dance, reformed the orthodox church into total submission. Peter did not quite succeed in his brazen reforms, so he left a testament ordering the Russian Empire to conquer Europe again. Peter the Great beheaded old imperial gard, created modern army that won and built a fleet that sank. Peter performed a live trial of this new army on the king of Sweden Karl XII who also claimed russian throne, beat Karl and his army rumored to be the best of this time into pulp in Poltava, Ukraine . Peter the Great was reformer to the hilt. Russia paid the the high price for his reforms in blood, sweat and tears. The series History: Fiction or Science? contains data, illustrations, charts and formulae containing irrefutable evidence of mathematical, statistical and astronomical nature. Feel free to use them in your eventual discussions with the avid devotees of classical chronology. In fact, before reading this book, you have most probably been one of such devotees.
History: Fiction or Science? is the most explosive tractate on history ever written – however, every theory it contains, no matter how unorthodox, is backed by solid scientific data.
The dominating historical discourse in its current state was essentially crafted in the XVI century from a rather contradictory jumble of sources such as innumerable copies of ancient Latin and Greek manuscripts whose originals had vanished in the Dark Ages and the allegedly irrefutable proof offered by late mediaeval astronomers, resting upon the power of ecclesial authorities. Nearly all of its components are blatantly untrue!
For some of us, it shall possibly be quite disturbing to see the magnificent edifice of classical history to turn into an ominous simulacrum brooding over the snake pit of mediaeval politics. Twice so, in fact: the first seeing the legendary millenarian dust on the ancient marble turn into a mere layer of dirt – one that meticulous unprejudiced research can eventually remove.The second, and greater, attack of unease comes with the awareness of just how many areas of human knowledge still trust the elephants, turtles and whales of the consensual chronology to support them. Nothing can remedy that except for an individual chronological revolution happening in the minds of a large enough number of people.

Dr Fomenko et al as scientists are ready to recognize the alleged mistakes of New Chronology, to repent and to retract if and only if:
- radiocarbon dating methods or dendrochronology pass the black box' tests;
- astronomy refutes their results on eclipses;
- Robert Newton (US astrophisist) was wrong calling Ptolemy a con man.
At present historians are not willing to perform. The radiocarbon dating labs run their very costly tests only if is the sample to be dated is accompanied with an idea of age pronounced by historians on basis of...subjective..mmm...gutfeeling and the history books they have been writing for the last 400 years. Radiocarbon labs politely bill for their fiddling and finetuning with C14 to get the dates 'to order' of historians. Circulus vitiosus is perfect.